cirugía estética mamaria

Expósito A,  Escobar H,  Tamayo A, González JS
Acta Médica. 2021; Vol. 22, No. 3

La mastoplastia de aumento es uno de los procedimientos de cirugía plástica más comunes en aquellas mujeres que no están satisfechas con el tamaño de sus mamas. Fue el cirujano plástico Hoeler,quien en el año 1973 realizó el primer aumento mamario por vía axilar. La ausencia de cicatrices en la región mamaria y el mejor control en el posicionamiento del surco inframamario están entre las principales ventajas de esta técnica quirúrgica. El objetivo del estudio fue valorar los resultados de la mastoplastia de aumento por vía axilar sin endoscopio.

Ono MT; Karner BM
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. 2019; 7 (11):e2523

 

La mastopexia de aumento es uno de los desafíos más difíciles que enfrentan los cirujanos plásticos, especialmente en lo que respecta a la sostenibilidad de la plenitud del polo superior y la corrección de la ptosis del polo inferior. Describimos nuestra técnica para la mastopexia de aumento que proporciona soporte muscular inferolateral al implante y estandariza una secuencia de etapas quirúrgicas para resolver múltiples situaciones y presentar los resultados de los pacientes que se sometieron a dicho abordaje.

Groth, A; Graf, R.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, February 2020, Volume 44, Issue 1

portada - Aesthetic Plastic Surgery - Vol. 41; No. 2 (2017)Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is an uncommon T-cell, CD-30+/ALK lymphoma. Late (9 years) periprosthetic fluid (seroma) is the most common presentation (90% of the cases). A combination of textured breast implant, bacterial contamination, and genetic predisposition seems to be necessary for BIA-ALCL to occur. There are 35 million patients with implants in the world, and at the present moment, 573 cases of BIA-ALCL have been reported.

Magnusson, M. et als.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: March 2019 – Volume 143 – Issue 3S – p 74S-81S

portada - PRS - Vol. 132; No. 2 (2013)The link between breast implants and systemic disease has been reported since the 1960s. Although many studies have looked at either supporting or refuting its existence, the issue still persists and has now been labeled “breast implant illness.” The rise of patient advocacy and communication through social media has led to an increasing number of presentations to plastic surgeons. This article summarizes the history of breast implants and systemic disease, critically analyzes the literature (and any associated deficiencies), and suggests a way forward through systematic scientific study.

Malhotra, A. et als.
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery: July 2018 – Volume 142 – Issue 1 – p 9e–16e

portada - PRS - Vol. 132; No. 2 (2013)Primary evidence for the role of endocrinologic investigations in patients with adolescent gynecomastia is lacking in the current literature. The objective of this study was to assess the yield of endocrinologic investigations in the evaluation of adolescent gynecomastia to inform current practice for this common condition.

Brown, T.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open: March 2018 – Volume 6 – Issue 3 – p e1700

portada - PRS Global Open - Vol. 6; No. 3 (2018)

Increased surface area of mammary implants is suggested as a causative agent for the development of biofilms, which may lead to capsular contraction. The aim of this study was to quantify the surface areas of round implants of different textures and examine how these data can be interpreted with regard to clinical observation.
Surface areas of textured round breast implants were calculated from previously reported confocal scanning microscopic assessment, and dimensions sourced from 3 breast implant manufacturers (McGhan, Mentor, and Silimed). Statistical comparisons were made between manufacturers for different implant volumes, profiles, and texturing.

Barone, M. et als.
European Journal of Plastic Surgery, April 2018, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 109–118

portada - EJPS - Vol. 35 (2012)A patient’s perspective is usually measured by patient-reported outcome instruments, which are becoming increasingly relevant to current research on clinical outcomes. The aims of our review were to identify studies that evaluated patient satisfaction after gynecomastia correction, analyze existing questionnaires, and summarize the development, psychometric properties and content of the questionnaires.

Agarwal, S. et als.
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2017-07-01, Volúmen 70, Número 7, Páginas 865-870

portada - JPRAS - Vol. 70; No. 7 (2017)Implant infections in the setting of breast reconstruction present a significant setback for patients with breast cancer. Traditional management of implant infections is predicated on the operative removal of the implant and delayed replacement. Another option for implant infection management has emerged in which the soft tissue infection is neutralized, the implant is removed, the surgical site is washed out, and a new implant replaced immediately. In this study, we present our findings with the implementation of this technique and an algorithm for choosing which patients are the most appropriate candidates on the basis of a retrospective review.

Schmitt, W; Eichhorn, M; Ford, R. D.
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2016-01-01, Volúmen 69, Número 1, Páginas 55-60

portada - JPRAS - Vol. 69; No. 1 (2015)Augmentation mammaplasty is one of the most common surgical procedures performed by plastic surgeons. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost of the initial procedure and its subsequent complications, as well as project the cost of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-recommended surveillance imaging.